October 31, 2008

“A civil servant, even badly noted, must have sufficient wages”



The agents of the public office will be paid soon with the merit. This new system worries the trade unions which ask for security.

Civils servant from now on paid with the merit. The idea is not new, but the calendar is specified. A decree must appear in the next days, “at the beginning of November” ensures the ministry for the Public office. ( Finance Information City )

Initially the few 200.000 civils servant of State of “the administrative die will be concerned”. But in the long term, all the public office will adopt this new system of remuneration, called “premium of functions and results” (PFR).

“This term can bring to a confusion. It is not only one premium, because all the system of remuneration of the civils servant is reconsidered” explains one with the cabinet of Eric Woerth, the Minister for the budget and the Public office. “There will be part of remuneration fixed, according to the rank and the responsibilities. And a variable part, according to the annual maintenance of evaluation.”

“It is the open door with arbitrary”

For the trade unions, this premium of functions and results - intended to replace all the existing allowances and other allowances - are source of concerns. Favorable “to the taking into account of the merit in the remuneration of the civil servant”, the CFTC-FAE fears on the other hand the installation of this reform. “The passage from one marking system to another must be done in progressive manner and not day at the following day as the government considers it. We also wish to have guarantees of equity: a civil servant, even badly noted, must have sufficient wages to live!”

“Absurd, the civil servant will not have to do intelligent work any more but figure” is indignant the Solidaires trade union, in a leaflet published last on October 20. “False, the ministry answers, one will evaluate the quality (and not the quantity) of provided work! With methods evaluation adapted to each trade. For several months, one has endeavoured to form our DRH (Directing human resources, note) with the techniques of evaluation.” And to add, to reassure the anxious ones: “Besides, one will go there prudently: each ministry will take the time necessary to rock of a system of remuneration to the other.”

Thi-Trinh Lescure, deputy associated trade union Interdependent, in démord not: “once more, it is logic even public service which is attacked: how can one base all the evaluation on only one annual maintenance with the hierarchy? It is the open door with arbitrary”, regrets it. “Include/understand well, we are not against a de-dusting of the current marking system, a blow of brush is necessary. But there, one passes from an extreme to the other!”

0 comments:

Post a Comment